Malaysia
Falling behindAsia-PacificUpper-middle income
Power #25 / 48Per-capita #31
Cognitive Power
32.5
of 100 · #25
CPI
32.5
CC
41.8
CDI
0.391
AIR
32.6
AIX
22.9
CRI
33.3
CM
36.3
CV
3.3%
Primary · absolute lens
Cognitive Power
32.5 · #25/48
Total national capacity — AI capital, compute, models & robotics. Strongest in researchers (total), research output (total), semiconductor capability.
Per-capita lens
Cognitive Coefficient
41.8 · #31/48
How deep infrastructure runs per person — rewards intensity, like GDP-per-capita or the HDI.
CC projection to 2040 — Baseline
All 8 scenarios →Monte-Carlo band (P10–P90) around the median path. Dashed = illustrative historical reconstruction.
Median (P50)P10–P90 bandReconstruction
Pillar profile
Insight engine
Malaysia ranks #31 of 48 on the Cognitive Coefficient (41.8/100), with a trajectory classified as Falling behind relative to the frontier. Its strongest pillars are digital literacy, ai access; the binding constraints are ai adoption, knowledge infrastructure.
Risks
- Low cognitive resilience: heavy reliance on externally-controlled frontier infrastructure.
- Relative position is eroding — growth pace trails the frontier, widening the gap.
Opportunities
- Largest headroom in AI Adoption (19.7/100) — targeted investment compounds fastest here.
- Largest headroom in Knowledge Infrastructure (29.5/100) — targeted investment compounds fastest here.
Recommended actions
- Prioritise the weakest pillar (AI Adoption) to lift the geometric-mean development index (CDI).
- Convert access into utilization: workforce AI-skilling and agentic-workflow adoption.
- Broaden the base (education + data governance) to raise resilience and reduce concentration risk.
▲
These are model outputs and scenarios, not forecasts of actual outcomes. This platform measures access to, utilization of, and leverage from cognitive infrastructure — not intelligence. No causality or certainty is claimed.